Human Rights and Businesses - the list no-one should be on...
Human rights and businesses may seem like odd bed-fellows yet there are many companies (large and small) who, while they may not appear to be breaching human rights themselves, actively support countries whose human rights records are less than admirable. Perhaps it's only now, in the year that China is hosting the Olympic Games, that human rights and businesses is finally getting the attention it deserves.
You would have thought that in this day and age, to still be speaking about human rights - and the violation of them - would have been a thing of the past. Indeed, with both the Universal Declaration on Human Rights in 1948 and the 1993 Vienna World Conference both reiterating the rights of human beings in all countries, surely we shouldn't still be discussing this 60 years later? Yet, again, sadly we are. This is where businesses can make a difference.
One of the grey areas for years has been how businesses have circumnavigated the contentious matter of human rights - whether it's actually in the workplace, or by supporting other businesses or Governments that have a poor track record in human rights. We may feel all smug in the West, pronouncing that we look after our citizens and offer human rights to all, but this is a blatantly false belief. We only need to look at Guantanamo Bay for an example of how great our human rights are on a personal level, and the likes of Nike and similar for their (alleged) sweatshop practices. Or how about Wal-Mart's employee "pay structure" (and I use that term loosely) - after all, this is a company whose own Annual Report in 2006 stated that it had received 57 wage and hour lawsuits, and was also successfully sued for $172 million in damages for failing to provide meal breaks for almost 116,000 workers in December 2005.
Now, with around three months until the Olympics open in Beijing, once again the cold eye of scrutiny turns to businesses and human rights transgressions, as China comes under attack for its ongoing poor record in human rights over the years. These include the persecution of anyone that dares to oppose the oppressive Chinese authorities, the continuing crackdown in Tibet, the violations against media freedom and much, much more. You would have thought that with all this controversy going on, businesses would have wanted to stay well away, right? Come on - this is greedy corporations we're speaking of here.

Instead of using the Beijing Olympics to make a stand and show they actually care about people as opposed to just money, there are many businesses that are still happy to sponsor the Olympics. According to The Olympic Partner Programme (TOP), created and managed by the International Olympic Committee, the 12 TOP sponsors of this year's Olympics are:
1. Coca-Cola
2. Atos Origin
3. GE
4. Johnson-Johnson
5. Kodak
6. Lenovo
7. Manulife
8. McDonald's (surprise, surprise...)
9. Omega
10. Panasonic
11. Samsung
12. VISA
Looking at some of the names on that list, you might be surprised they're happy to be associated with a Government that ignores any forms of human rights. After all, Johnson-Johnson prides itself on being "your family company". And GE's own Human Rights policy states that "GE seeks to advance human rights by leading by example – through our interactions with customers and suppliers, the products we offer and our relationships with communities and governments.” Especially if there are big tainted bucks involved, huh, GE?
Although many of the world's most influential leaders have made their feelings clear on China and her human rights record leading up to the games, these companies in the TOP 12 list have been pretty silent. Their excuse? They don't want to become involved in politics. Right.... Therefore, it stands to reason that by paying millions in sponsorship money they're letting their greed do the talking instead - and that allows people to answer back with their views.
I wonder how much longer these companies would stay silent if people spoke with their wallets, and stopped buying their goods or services? Or let their voices be heard in other ways, such as the outcry and furore that followed the Olympic flame everywhere it went prior to its arrival in China. Would these companies be shamed into withdrawing their support that is so out of tune with reality? Possibly, possibly not. However, one thing is certain - this isn't something that's going to go away.

Already there are thousands of bloggers making a stand with the Bloggers Unite project, which is celebrating its first anniversary. The Human Rights Watch has a Take Action campaign that offers advice on how you can try and effect change in the minds of businesses everywhere. If you're a business owner yourself, take a look at who you deal with and whether this needs to change. We might not make a difference overnight, but we can make a difference, and that's the most important thing of all.
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights." Universal Declaration of Human Rights












Reader Comments (6)
Nice post, Danny! Say it isn't so, McDonald's! Thanks for the information!
Awesome post, Danny!
These companies are all about increasing their market share. I can guarantee any business lost in the West by doing this will be more than made up by the business gained in China. China is huge. And, lest we forget Guantanamo bay, its not just China with human rights issues.
Personally, I refuse to but these company's products and have done for years. If we ALL did that, maybe things would change.
Hi guys,
Thanks for taking the time to read the post and comment on it.
@ Artpark - yep, unfortunately McDonald's has been, and continues to be, one of the worst proprietors in ignorance when it comes to many things - human rights is merely the tip of the iceberg with this company.
@ Pentad - thank you! Glad you enjoyed. :)
@ Luxury Real Estate Blog - I agree wholeheatedly with you. It's like the Green movement - we can only make the wholesale changes that need to be carried out if everyone works together. Sadly, as you say (and as the post alludes to as well), we have our own issues as well, and we need to adress these if we're to condemn.
Thanks for the comments guys, appreciate it!
Wow. Great article as usual. Its obvious that as long as there is money to be made, human dignity and peace will pay a huge price. Even those victimized by the system, depend on the money brought in via that system to survive. Its very sad that human rights don't bring a premium. If they did, you would never see those rights violated.
Interesting signs they have posted in China today in response to the recent earthquakes:
"Be Diligent in helping yourself survive." The government wants to control people's lives to far reaching degrees except when its needed.
Hi Wendy,
Thanks for your comments - always appreciated! :)
I agree - the Governments that make the biggest noise in controlling its citizens are often the most silent when it comes to their people actually needing them...